The Latest: Rams cancel practice, cite caution over virus

126064892_web1_mmi.founders.day

MMI Preparatory School holds annual Founder’s Day program

PHILADELPHIA &mdash; President Donald Trump&rsquo;s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected its latest effort to challenge the state&rsquo;s election results.
				Trump&rsquo;s lawyers vowed to appeal to the Supreme Court despite the judge&rsquo;s assessment that the &ldquo;campaign&rsquo;s claims have no merit.&rdquo;
				&ldquo;Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,&rdquo; Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote for the three-judge panel.
				The case had been argued last week in a lower court by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who insisted during five hours of oral arguments that the 2020 presidential election had been marred by widespread fraud in Pennsylvania. However, Giuliani failed to offer any tangible proof of that in court.
				U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann had said the campaign&rsquo;s error-filled complaint, &ldquo;like Frankenstein&rsquo;s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together&rdquo; and denied Giuliani the right to amend it for a second time.
				The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals called that decision justified. The three judges on the panel were all appointed by Republican presidents. including Bibas, a former University of Pennsylvania law professor appointed by Trump. Trump&rsquo;s sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for 20 years, retiring in 2019.
				Friday&rsquo;s ruling comes four days after Pennsylvania officials certified their vote count for President-elect Joe Biden, who defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the state. Nationally, Biden and running mate Kamala Harris garnered nearly 80 million votes, a record in U.S. presidential elections.
				Trump has said he hopes the Supreme Court will intervene in the race as it did in 2000, when its decision to stop the recount in Florida gave the election to Republican George W. Bush. On Nov. 5, as the vote count continued, Trump posted a tweet saying the &ldquo;U.S. Supreme Court should decide!&rdquo;
				Ever since, Trump and his surrogates have attacked the election as flawed and filed a flurry of lawsuits to try to block the results in six battleground states. But they&rsquo;ve found little sympathy from judges, nearly all of whom dismissed their complaints about the security of mail-in ballots, which millions of people used to vote from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
				Trump perhaps hopes a Supreme Court he helped steer toward a conservative 6-3 majority would be more open to his pleas, especially since the high court upheld Pennsylvania&rsquo;s decision to accept mail-in ballots through Nov. 6 by only a 4-4 vote last month. Since then, Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett has joined the court.
				&ldquo;The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud,&rdquo; Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis tweeted after Friday&rsquo;s ruling. &ldquo;On to SCOTUS!&rdquo;
				In the case before Brann, the Trump campaign asked to disenfranchise the state&rsquo;s 6.8 million voters, or at least the 700,000 who voted by mail in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and other Democratic-leaning areas.
				&ldquo;One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,&rdquo; Brann wrote in his scathing ruling on Nov. 21. &ldquo;That has not happened.&rdquo;
				A separate Republican challenge that reached the Pennsylvania Supreme Court this week seeks to stop the state from further certifying any races on the ballot. Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf&rsquo;s administration is fighting that effort, saying it would prevent the state&rsquo;s legislature and congressional delegation from being seated in the coming weeks.
				On Thursday, Trump said the Nov. 3 election was still far from over. Yet he offered the clearest signal to date that he would leave the White House peaceably on Jan. 20 if the Electoral College formalizes Biden&rsquo;s win.
				&ldquo;Certainly I will. But you know that,&rdquo; Trump said at the White House, taking questions from reporters for the first time since Election Day.
				Yet on Friday, he continued to baselessly attack Detroit, Atlanta and other Democratic cities with large Black populations as the source of &ldquo;massive voter fraud.&rdquo; And he claimed, without evidence, that a Pennsylvania poll watcher had uncovered computer memory drives that &ldquo;gave Biden 50,000 votes&rdquo; apiece.
				All 50 states must certify their results before the Electoral College meets on Dec. 14, and any challenge to the results must be resolved by Dec. 8. Biden won both the Electoral College and popular vote by wide margins.

US appeals court rejects Trump appeal over Pennsylvania race